Infatuation Rules
Photo: Monstera
The third letter in the personality type acronym corresponds to preference within the thinking-feeling pair: “T” stands for thinking and “F” stands for feeling. The forth letter in the personality type acronym corresponds a person's preference within the judging-perceiving pair: “J” for judging and “P” for perception.
Intense Emotional Connection One of the reasons why men pull away is because they don't feel an intense emotional connection. A guy might like you...
Read More »
On the flirtatious side, the stick-straight profile received 120 winks, while curly locks caught winks from 60 men. In about 10 percent of the...
Read More »
Cheeky Flirty Questions to Ask a Guy What would you do If I kissed you right now? What is your biggest turn on? What is your biggest turn off? Do...
Read More »
Bonus tip: Give him a free pass to go out and drink beer with his friends. 1) Touch his arm. ... 2) Send him a random text message in the middle of...
Read More »Sensing-Intuition preference represents the method by which one perceives information: Sensing means an individual mainly relies on concrete, actual information - “in so far as objects release sensations, they matter” [1]), whereas Intuition means a person relies upon their conception about things based on their understanding of the world. Thinking-Feeling preference indicates the way an individual processes information. Thinking preference means an individual makes decisions based on logical reasoning, and is less affected by feelings and emotions. Feeling preference means that an individual's base for decisions is mainly feelings and emotions. Jung introduced the idea of hierarchy and direction of psychological functions. According to Jung, one of the psychological functions - a function from either judging or perception pair – would be primary (also called dominant). In other words, one pole of the poles of the two dichotomies (Sensing-Feeling and Thinking-Feeling) dominates over the rest of the poles. The Extraversion-Introversion preference sets the direction of the dominant function: the direction points to the source of energy that feeds it – i.e. to the outer world for extraverts and to the inner world for introverts. Jung suggested that a function from the complimentary pair would be secondary (also called auxiliary) but still be “a determining factor” [1]. I.e. if Intuition is dominant, then the auxiliary one is either Thinking or Feeling. If Sensing is dominant, then the auxiliary one can also be either Thinking or Feeling. However, if Thinking is dominant, then the auxiliary one is either Sensing or Intuition, and if Feeling is dominant then the auxiliary one is either Sensing or Intuition. In other words, the auxiliary function never belongs to the same dichotomy. Jung called feeling and thinking types “rational” [1] because they are characterized by the dominance of judging functions that provide reasoning rationale (be it thinking or feeling). “Rational” or Judging preference results in thinking, feelings, response and behavior that consciously operate in line with certain rules, principles or norms. People with dominant "rational" or judging preference perceive the world as an ordered structure that follows a set of rules. He called sensing and intuitive types “irrational” [1] because they are characterized by dominance of the functions of perception (either sensing or intuition), and therefore their “commissions and omissions are based not upon reasoned judgment but upon the absolute intensity of perception” [1]. “Irrational” or Perceiving preference operates with opportunities, i.e. with a range of possible outcomes that result from assumed premises or from sensations, mostly driven by the unconscious processes. People with dominant "irrational" or Perceiving preference thinking see the world as a structure that can take various forms and outcomes. It is possible to determine, either by observation or by asking certain questions, preference of Judging vs. Perceiving and the strength thereof in a person.
"In the case of polygamy, there is a universal standard – it is understood to be a sin, therefore polygamists are not admitted to positions of...
Read More »
For example, don't ask how their last relationship ended, how financially stable they are, or if they have any health issues. Save those questions...
Read More »The framework of the 16 personality types has become popular outside of behavioural science and academia, due to its apparent simplicity and thanks to the efforts of Briggs Myers to offer personality type descriptions that are straightforward and relevant enough to ordinary people, and not just to psychologists and behavioural scientists. However, such basic approach to personality type has considerable practical limitations when applied to workplace-related issues. It produces the same, static cliché-like descriptions for different individual realizations of the same personality type, and the descriptions have a general focus rather than a workplace-specific one. In reality, however, Jungian personality types realize themselves in the workplace in a multitude of ways. Each of the Jungian dichotomies may reveal itself in various ways. Humanmetrics Jung Typology Profiler for Workplace™ (JTPW™) assessment instrument was designed to effectively overcome these limitations. JTPW™ instrument uses methodology, questionnaire, scoring, dynamic descriptions and software that are proprietary to Humanmetrics. Not only does it identify the expressiveness of an individual’s preferences in the above mentioned four Jungian dimensions of personality type, and recognizes the important differences within the same Jungian personality types, it goes beyond by evaluating several additional dimensions that make it possible to apply Jungian typology to, and effectively assess behavioural preferences of an individual in, the workplace. The JTPW™ instrument features several assessment reports that are focused on various behavioural aspects in the workplace and are dynamically personalized based on multiple factors. Another unique feature of the JTPW™ instrument is the JTPW™ Personality Radar™ graph that visually represents the strengths of the key workplace-related behavioural qualities, and offering a comprehensive, yet easy to use, “snapshot” of an individual’s personality in the workplace. For more in-depth information on using Jung Typology for workplace-related problems, please read the following articles and resources:
How to deal with People Who Always Try to Put You Down You don't need approval, you don't need permission. Once you are an adult, you have the...
Read More »
Coping with life after a divorce necessitates that you recognize and accept that it's going to take time and effort to heal. The negative feelings...
Read More »
Maria del Carmen Bousada de Lara is the oldest verified mother; she was aged 66 years 358 days when she gave birth to twins; she was 130 days older...
Read More »
To be safe, couples would serve themselves well to see each other once a week for the first month, and then increase the frequency with each week...
Read More »